US crackdown on advanced chips gives China an opening on old technology


Since 2022, the US has been hyperfocused on restricting Chinese production of high-end semiconductors. The Commerce Department has imposed stifling export controls and allocated tens of billions of dollars to incentivize advanced chip production in the US.

In response, China has forged its own policy — and it has a heavy focus on less advanced but widely used “legacy” chips. New data shows that Beijing is gaining leverage in that market quickly.

China is now on track to install three times as much chipmaking capacity this year as all other countries plan to do over the next three years combined, according to Silverado Policy Accelerator, a nonprofit think tank. The country is poised to control roughly 40% of overall legacy chip production by 2027, according to a study by the Rhodium Group.

“What China’s doing in that segment of the market is what it has done in many other industries,” Sarah Stewart, CEO of Silverado, told Yahoo Finance. “They are infusing that segment of the market with … below-market loans [and] all sorts of subsidies that are not offered by anybody else. None of that is tethered to any true demand signal.”

China’s efforts have raised fears that the semiconductor industry could be at risk of following in the path of the solar and steel industries, where overcapacity in China contributed to a collapse in global prices.

Price pressures are already building. Silverado’s report shows that Chinese firms offered prices that were 20% to 30% lower than their non-Chinese competitors in 2022 and 2023. Those discounts came despite strong industry pricing, particularly in 2022, when a broad semiconductor shortage led to record sales.

While Chinese-made chips are still largely used to supply the domestic market, steep discounts have helped firms like Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), Hua Hong (1347.HK), and Nexchip (688249.SS) wrestle market share away from non-Chinese competitors including GlobalFoundries (GFS) and Samsung, according to consulting firm JW Insights.

China accounted for roughly a third of global legacy chip production last year, nearly double that of 2015, according to the Rhodium Group. It’s is expected to increase that capacity to 39% by 2027.

Although advanced chips represent the most cutting-edge technology, their usage is contingent on a foundation built by older semiconductors.

The Commerce Department defines these legacy chips as semiconductors built on nodes that are 28 nanometers or larger. They are considered foundational because they are critical to nearly every electrical device, from smartphones to household appliances, medical equipment, and military vehicles.

For example, a smartphone uses 160 to 170 chips, but just three of those are considered advanced, according to Silverado’s research. GPS, Wi-Fi, battery life, and camera controls are just a few of the functions dependent on legacy chips.

“There’s virtually no application that requires an advanced chip that can work without a foundational set of chips,” Stewart said. “They go hand in hand.”

Yet Biden officials have focused their efforts on producing advanced chips over legacy ones, largely because China lags far behind in that technology.

The Commerce Department announced a combined $3.4 billion in investments to build on US capacity to produce legacy chips, according to official data. That’s one-third of the incentives that have been allotted for leading-edge semiconductors.

National security is one reason for the emphasis on denying China advanced chips. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has said the administration’s export controls are intended to thwart Chinese advancements in artificial intelligence, military systems, and mass surveillance.

“Supercomputing, AI technology, AI chips in the wrong hands is as deadly as any weapon that we could provide,” Raimondo said at the Reagan National Defense Forum last year.

China has sought to build out its domestic semiconductor industry for years, pouring billions of dollars into homegrown players.

The current acceleration can be traced back to 2019, when the Commerce Department placed telecommunications giant Huawei on the entity list, cutting off access to critical suppliers including Google (GOOG), Qualcomm (QCOM), and Broadcom (AVGO) overnight.

The 2022 export controls, which all but banned American companies from supplying advanced chips and cutting-edge chipmaking equipment to China, only supercharged the country’s efforts.

HUAI'AN, CHINA - APRIL 29, 2024 - A worker produces chips for mobile phones, cars, LED lighting at a workshop in Huai 'an city, Jiangsu province, China, April 29, 2024. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images)HUAI'AN, CHINA - APRIL 29, 2024 - A worker produces chips for mobile phones, cars, LED lighting at a workshop in Huai 'an city, Jiangsu province, China, April 29, 2024. (Photo by Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

A worker produces chips for mobile phones, cars, and LED lighting at a workshop in Jiangsu province, China, April 29, 2024. (Costfoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images) (NurPhoto via Getty Images)

Stewart said China capitalized on Washington’s policy by ramping up production of legacy chips with the intention of expanding the country’s global market share, gaining leverage over the US, and controlling prices.

Central to the effort is China’s National Integrated Circuits Industry Development Investment Fund, which has raised $52 billion to develop semiconductor fabrication and design in 10 years with a focus on older chips, according to a report by Semiconductor Industry Association and BCG. It aims to raise $40 billion more by the end of the decade.

The industry has expanded on the backs of Western companies too. China was the largest global importer of semiconductor manufacturing equipment in 2023, importing $15 billion more than its closest competitor, Taiwan, according to Silverado.

China’s increased production capacity has raised alarm bells among policymakers and industry leaders.

This month, California lawmakers signed a letter urging the Commerce Department to pause unilateral export controls, saying further controls “could send longstanding US companies into a death spiral.”

Some, including Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, have warned about the repercussions of broad export controls, saying that too many restrictions risked accelerating China’s timeline for chip production.

“If that line is too restrictive, then China has to build its own chips,” he said, speaking at Computex in Taiwan.

U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina M. Raimondo attends a bilateral meeting between U.S. President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping at Filoli estate on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, in Woodside, California, U.S., November 15, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin LamarqueU.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina M. Raimondo attends a bilateral meeting between U.S. President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping at Filoli estate on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, in Woodside, California, U.S., November 15, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

US Secretary of Commerce Gina M. Raimondo attends a bilateral meeting between US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Woodside, Calif., on Nov. 15, 2023. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque) (REUTERS / Reuters)

Earlier this year, the Commerce Department launched a review of the country’s supply chains to get a better grasp on how US companies are sourcing foundational chips.

And a few months ago, the Department of Defense imposed its own procurement restrictions on government agencies, banning them from using China-sourced chips starting in 2027. The National Defense Authorization Act also banned transactions with entities that use Chinese chips in critical defense and intelligence system products.

The European Commission has also taken note, surveying companies to better understand how Chinese firms are using older chips to undermine them, according to multiple reports.

According to Reva Goujon, a director at the Rhodium Group, countering China’s semiconductor ambitions will ultimately require additional policy support and cooperation among US allies.

“The US needs to effectively create an ex-China market for chips to guarantee demand among US and trusted partners,” said Goujon. “The sustainability of the AI boom is a major variable, as is the US election. Either a Harris administration carries through that plurilateral momentum or we see further fracturing and leaky controls from a Trump 2.0 polarization of partners.”

Click here for the latest technology news that will impact the stock market

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance



Source link

About The Author

Scroll to Top